Monday, June 15, 2020

美国众院公布首份新冠报告 详述中共隐匿疫情

美国国会众议院外交事务委员会共和党人针对新冠病毒起源及爆发过程公布阶段性的初步调查报告,内容按照时间线详细列举自2019年12月底以来有关新冠病毒疫情的重要事件,并说明中国共产党政府如何隐匿新冠病毒疾病(Covid-19)信息以及世界卫生组织在其中所扮演的角色和功能。报告呼吁对中共早期隐瞒疫情的行为展开国际调查,并要求世卫组织总干事辞职。

美国国会众议院外交事务委员会共和党人针对新冠病毒起源及爆发过程公布阶段性的初步调查报告,内容按照时间线详细列举自2019年12月底以来有关新冠病毒疫情的重要事件,并说明中国共产党政府如何隐匿新冠病毒疾病(Covid-19)信息以及世界卫生组织在其中所扮演的角色和功能。报告呼吁对中共早期隐瞒疫情的行为展开国际调查,并要求世卫组织总干事辞职。

“在几个月的调查后,愈来愈清楚明了中国共产党对新冠病毒的掩盖,特别是在疫情爆发初期时,他们的行为让原本可能是本地流行病转变成为一场全球大流行病的过程中发挥了重要作用,”来自德克萨斯州的麦考尔众议员在声明中说。

他还说道:“不幸的是,世界卫生组织在总干事谭德塞的领导下,世界卫生组织一再忽视病毒严重性的警告,甚至包括他们自己的卫生专家所发出的警告。同时在未经独立证实的情况下,不断复述唱和中国共产党的宣传。这样的做法只会导致巨大的失败,我们必须揭发真相,如此一来我们才能建立未来保障措施,预防这种情况再次发生。”

这项初步调查结果可被视为是美国议员们呼吁就新冠病毒疫情大流行病展开调查以来由国会方面出台的首份官方报告。

作为持续进行的调查工作的一部分,这份长达50页的中期报告侧重于新冠病毒大流行早期阶段,也就是2020年1月23日前世界卫生组织宣布新冠病毒疫情为国际关注的突发公共卫生事件之前所发生的相关事件。

image.png

报告显示中国从未正式向世卫组织通报疫情

报告首先提到,中国当局确认的最早病例可追溯至2019年11月17日,随后几周,每天都出现1至5例的新病例报告。2019年12月16日,一名65岁男子因发烧和肺部感染被送往武汉市中心医院,在使用抗生素和抗流感药物后,这名男子的病情没有出现好转。后来发现这名男子在武汉华南海鲜市场工作。

报告说,在接下来的数天内,武汉各地医院开始出现数十例类似症状的疾病。截止12月20日为止,感染人数达到至少60人,其中包括在华南海鲜市场工作的人的家属,这些亲属与市场工作的人有密切接触但本身并未直接接触市场。报告指出,这显示为病毒人传人的早期迹象。

12月25日为止,武汉两间不同医院的医护人员在感染病毒后接受隔离治疗。报告提到,这是病毒人传人的第二个明确迹象。

报告指出,12月27日,武汉的医院和卫生官员收到当地一家处理病患样本的实验室通知,称这种疾病是由一种新的冠状病毒株所引起的,而这种冠状病毒的基因与导致2003年SARS大流行的病毒株相似度高达87%。

报告接着说,三天后,武汉市中心医院急诊科医生艾芬收到了实验室的检测结果,确认为“SARS冠状病毒”。于是艾芬医生通知医院主管,并将报告结果提供给医院的公共卫生部。

报告说,在同一家医院任职的李文亮医生得知消息后,在微信群组中告知友人“华南水果海鲜市场确诊了7例SARS。”

12月31日,中国媒体关于爆发非典肺炎的报道开始出现在网上。其中一篇报道的机器翻译被全球电子新兴传染病疫情通报系统Pro-MED侦测到。

image.png

北京市民在广安体育中心外排队接受新冠病毒检测。(2020年6月15日)

报告指出,根据世卫组织紧急项目执行主任瑞恩医生(Dr. Michael Ryan)的说法,这则出现在全球电子新兴传染病疫情通报系统Pro-MED的通知是世界卫生组织得知武汉疫情爆发的信息来源。世卫组织日内瓦总部随后指示该组织中国办事处寻求中国政府协助对有关信息进行核实。

报告继续指出,尽管中国公开声称有向世卫组织及时通报了疫情,但中国政府实际上从未正式向世界卫生组织通报武汉爆发的疫情,也未在疫情初期向世卫组织提供相关信息,这已违反了世卫组织的《国际卫生条例》。

根据《国际卫生条例》,各国必须向世卫组织报告本国内新出现的疾病。

报告指责世卫组织忽视病毒人传人警告、延缓宣布国际关注突发公卫事件

除了上述提到病毒在早期已出现人传人的迹象之外,报告还指出,台湾卫生福利部疾病管制署官员在12月31日曾发电邮给世卫组织,对中国网络上出现的“至少7起不明肺炎”的消息表示担忧。

台湾疾病管制署在电邮中称,自网络上得知,在中国武汉市爆发至少7起非典型肺炎。中国惯称萨斯(SARS)为“非典型肺炎”。

报告提到,除了至少“7起病例”的说法与李文亮医生在微信群组中所发布的信息吻合之外,台湾卫生官员的电邮还警示病患已进行隔离治疗,由此研判该等病例有人传人的可能。

报告说,世卫组织仅以一份书面声明回覆台湾政府的电邮。声明称,台湾的担忧已被转发给其他专家,但为了其他成员国的利益,有关消息不会发布在他们的内部网站上。

根据众议院共和党人公布的这份调查报告,世卫组织一直到今年1月4日才公布其对武汉爆发疫情所掌握的资讯。同一天,香港大学感染及传染病中心总监何柏良也公开警示,病毒在人际间传播的可能性很高。

不过,近10天后,直到1月13日泰国出现首宗中国境外确诊病例,世界卫生组织才表示“有可能存在有限的人传人……但现在非常清楚的是,我们没有看到持续的人传人。”

世卫组织官方推特更在同一天说,“中国当局没有发现明确证据显示病毒会人传人。”

image.png

国会共和党人的报告还发现,1月20和21日,世卫组织在中国当地的办事处和西太平洋区域办事处赴武汉进行了实地考察。两天的访问结束后,世卫组织总干事谭德塞博士(Dr. Tedros Adhanom)最后决定不宣布疫情为“国际关注的突发公共卫生事件”,并称“这是中国的紧急情况,但尚未成为全球卫生紧急情况。目前,没有证据表明在中国以外的地方存在人传人现象。”

报告说,随后几天,法国、澳大利亚和加拿大陆续传出首起病例。1月28日,世卫组织总干事谭德塞到北京进行访问,并赞扬中国共产党对疫情的处理,称“中国展现出透明度,包括分享病毒数据和基因序列。”但是报告指出,来自中国的有关病毒信息并非公开讲话,是由一名中国研究人员在网上泄漏后而流传开来。这名研究人员也随后遭到惩罚。

两天后,1月30日,谭德塞才召开紧急会议,宣布新冠病毒疫情为“国际关注的突发公共卫生事件”。此时,全球已有近1万个确诊病例,其中包括83起分布在18个中国以外的国家。

美国也在1月30日这一天确认了第一宗人传人的病例。

世卫组织总干事谭德塞一直到41天后、也就是3月11日才宣布2019新冠病毒为全球大流行病。

报告对武汉病毒研究所安全和研究提出担忧和质疑

image.png

中国科学院武汉病毒研究所大楼 (网络照片 )

报告还提到了武汉病毒研究所所引发的安全疑虑。报告称,虽然武汉病毒学研究所在许多关于新冠肺炎起源的讨论中时常被提及,但科学界和情报界目前的广泛共识是,新冠病毒的起源属于天然发生。

不过,报告说,没有“零号病患”的流行病学数据、缺少已被销毁的实验室样本,或者病毒确切来源,研究人员可能永远无法得知病毒的源头。报告建议,谨慎的做法是针对武汉病毒研究所目前已知的情况,包括其20个实验室进行病毒研究。

随着武汉病毒研究所成为新闻焦点的同时,有关这间实验室的安全规范和标准也引起各界质疑。据报道,2018年美国国务院发过至少两封有关武汉病毒研究所担忧的电报。这两封电报分别来自美国驻北京大使馆和武汉总领事馆的国务院人员,重点均与武汉病毒研究所的安全和管理是否严谨相关。

据众议院共和党所公布的报告称,长期研究蝙蝠和冠状病毒的武汉病毒所研究员石正丽也曾提及对实验室安全的担忧。报告引述石正丽在一次采访中讲述她是如何重新检查自己实验室多年来的记录,以检查材料是否有处理不当的。她还将收集到的冠状病毒样本与导致新冠病毒疫情的SARS病毒样本进行了比对。石正丽表示,在完成审查后并未能找到对应匹配结果后,她感到松了一口气。

“有鉴于中国共产党拒绝分享武汉病毒研究所和中国其他地方的样本,国际社会也无从对石正丽的说辞进行核查,”报告说。

报告表示,虽然目前仍无法证明正在进行的大流行病是否为实验室流出(意外或非意外)的结果,但石正丽曾对于实验室的安全问题有所质疑这件事本身就令人感到担忧。

报告建议:撤换WHO领导层、展开国际调查、修改国际卫生条例

报告尾声提出三点建议,包括撤换世界卫生组织领导人、针对中国共产党在大流行爆发初期隐匿信息的行为展开国际调查以及改革《国际卫生条例》。

image.png

世界卫生组织(WHO)总干事谭德塞(Dr. Tedros Adhanom)

报告称,世卫组织总干事谭德塞已失去各界对其领导力的信任,为了恢复成员国对世界卫生组织的信心,让世卫组织恢复职责,为全球公共卫生提供准确技术建议,谭德塞必须为其因新冠病毒大流行的不当影响承担责任并辞职。

“世界的健康不能承受(世卫组织的)无能和管理不善,”报告说。

报告还呼吁美国应该和理念接近的世卫组织成员国以及台湾展开国际合作调查,追究中国共产党在疫情爆发初期隐瞒信息的行为以及世卫组织未履行《国际卫生条例》义务的责任。

报告提到,这类的调查应该包括追溯调查当年萨斯病毒和这次的新冠病毒等起源、中国共产党隐瞒疫情相关科学和卫生信息的做法、中国共产党的掩盖活动对世卫组织的影响以及中国共产党的掩盖活动对全球反应的影响。

报告写道,目前除了欧盟委员会外,澳大利亚、日本、新西兰、瑞典和台湾等政府已公开表示支持对疫情进行独立调查。

此外,报告建议美国总统、国务卿利用美国在国际组织中的话语权、投票权和影响力寻求针对《国际卫生条例》进行更多改革,包括要求会员国提供的信息,世卫组织针对非官方的卫生事件报告有进行调查和告知成员国的义务,以及修改世卫组织宣布国际关注的突发公共卫生事件的程序。

不过,报告认为,尽管世卫组织未能遵守《国际卫生条例》,善尽其职责,履行对会员国的义务,但“我们不认为美国退出或建立一个与世卫组织分庭抗礼的国际组织是一条正确的前行道路。”

报告最后提到,无论是2003年的萨斯病毒,还是2019年新型冠状病毒,还是造成此次全球大流行病的真正成因,仍有许多悬而未决的疑问。尽管这份报告为初步阶段性的调查结果,但已经有些事实可以确定—“毫无疑问的是,中国共产党在此次疫情中积极从事掩盖活动,目的在于混淆数据、隐藏相关公共卫生信息并打压试图向世界发出警告的医生和记者。”

A History of the 2025 Sino–American War in the South China Sea

More than two decades after the fact, the reasons why the United States and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) avoided total war, let alone a nuclear exchange, during their armed conflict in the autumn of 2025 remain a source of dispute. What is clearer is why the Sino–American Littoral War broke out in the first place, and the course it took. Years of worsening U.S.–China relations, supercharged by the 2020 COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic that originated in Wuhan, China, and long fueled by endemic Chinese cyberattacks on American businesses and individuals, military jockeying in the South China Sea, and Beijing’s influence and propaganda campaigns, had created a deep reservoir of ill will and distrust of the other in each country.
When a series of accidents propelled Washington and Beijing into war, both sides were taken by surprise, but each saw the risk differently. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) feared the domestic repercussions of losing a war but had long convinced itself that Americans were a weak and uncommitted people who would not endanger their comfortable lifestyle. As for American leaders, they were naturally risk-averse and unconvinced they could maintain a major military campaign so far from home against the world’s second-most-powerful military. Each, therefore, tripped into war without a full plan for how to dominate and win. The result of the conflict — the establishment of three geopolitical blocs in East Asia — continues to this day. The resulting cold war between the United States and China became the defining feature of geopolitics in the Asia-Pacific in the middle of the 21st century.
The Gray Rhino: September 8–9, 2025
The Littoral War began with a series of accidental encounters in the skies and waters near Scarborough Shoal, in the South China Sea. Beijing had effectively taken control of the shoal, long a point of contention between China and the Philippines, in 2012. After Philippines president Rodrigo Duterte, who had steadily moved Manila toward China during the late 2010s, was impeached and removed from office, the Philippines’ new president steadily moved to reassert Manila’s claim to the shoal, and by the summer of 2025 sent coastal-patrol boats into waters near the contested territory. When armed People’s Armed Forces Maritime Militia (PAFMM) vessels pushed out the Philippine forces in early July, Manila appealed to Washington under its security treaty for assistance.
Prior Philippine requests for U.S. help in dealing with China had been largely shunted aside by Washington, even during the Trump administration. However, new U.S. president Gavin Newsom, who had been dogged during the 2024 campaign by allegations that Chinese cyber operations had benefited his candidacy, saw the Philippine request as an opportunity to show his willingness to take a hard line against Beijing. Newsom increased U.S. Air Force flights over the contested territory, using air bases made available by Manila, and sent the carrier USS Gerald Ford, along with escort vessels, on a short transit. On two occasions in late July, U.S. and Chinese ships came close to running into each other due to aggressive maneuvering by the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN), and a U.S. Navy FA-18 operating from the Gerald Ford was forced to take emergency evasive action to avoid colliding with a PLANAF J-15. Despite the increasing tensions, the U.S. Navy ships returned to Japan at the beginning of August, yet no diplomatic attempts were made to alter the trajectory of events. The fact that both sides knew some type of armed encounter was increasingly possible, if not probable, yet seemed to ignore the risk, led pundits to call the events surrounding the clash an example of a “gray rhino,” unlike the complete surprise represented by a “black swan” occurrence. Ironically, CCP general secretary Xi Jinping himself had warned about the dangers of “gray rhinos” back in 2018 and 2019.
In response to the brief uptick in U.S. Navy freedom-of-navigation operations near other Chinese-claimed territory in the Spratly and Paracel island chains, Beijing decided to fortify Scarborough Shoal, building airstrips and naval facilities as it had done in the Spratlys. As Scarborough lay only 140 miles from Manila, China’s announcement set off alarm bells in the Philippines. As Chinese naval construction ships approached Scarborough on September 4, dozens of small Philippine boats, many of them private, attempted to block them. On the second day of the maritime encounter, a Chinese frigate rammed a Philippine fishing boat, sinking it, with the loss of two Philippine fishermen. As news spread over the next several days, dozens more Philippine vessels, including the country’s entire coast guard, confronted the Chinese. Though no further ship collisions occurred, worldwide broadcast of video of the maritime confrontation further inflamed tensions.
At this point, on Saturday, September 6, U.S. Indo–Pacific Command, acting directly under orders from U.S. secretary of defense Michele Flournoy, dispatched one guided-missile destroyer, the USS Curtis Wilbur, and the Independence-class littoral combat ship USS Charleston (LCS-18) to the waters off Scarborough, and ordered the USS John C. Stennis aircraft carrier to head from its home port in Bremerton, Wash., to Pearl Harbor. In order not to inflame the high tensions, however, the White House and Pentagon decided not to send the Gerald Ford to the area. Instead, another U.S. guided-missile destroyer, USS Stethem (DDG 63), and a mine-countermeasures ship, the USS Patriot (MCM 7), were ordered to transit the Taiwan Strait. The next day, Beijing announced an air-defense identification zone over the entire South China Sea, demanding that all non-Chinese aircraft submit their flight plans to Chinese military authorities and receive clearance to proceed. While the U.S. Air Force and Navy immediately rejected China’s authority over the South China Sea, Chinese army and navy aerial patrols increased, and international civilian airliners complied with Beijing’s demands.
On Monday, September 8, at approximately 18:30 local time (10:30 Greenwich time; 00:30 Hawaii time; 05:30 Eastern time), a U.S. Navy EP-3 surveillance flight out of Japan over the Spratlys was intercepted by a PLAAF J-20 taking off from Fiery Cross Reef, in the same chain. After warning off the EP-3, the J-20 attempted a barrel roll over the American plane. The Chinese pilot sheared off most of the EP-3’s tail and left rear stabilizer; the Chinese plane lost a wing and went into an unrecoverable spin into the sea. The EP-3 also could not recover and plunged into the sea, killing all 22 Americans aboard. Tragically, the EP-3 was not even supposed to be flying, as the U.S. Navy had intended to replace the fleet with unmanned surveillance drones by 2020, but cost overruns and delays in the drone program led to occasional use of a limited number of aging manned aircraft in the region, especially when real-time interpretation of data was required.
Roughly 30 minutes later, before word of the EP-3’s downing had reached U.S. Indo–Pacific Command in Hawaii, let alone Washington or Beijing, 13 nautical miles northwest of Scarborough Shoal, the Bertholf (WMSL-750), a U.S. Coast Guard cutter returning from a training mission along with the Japan Coast Guard Kunigami-class patrol vessel Motobu, out of Naha in Okinawa, was approached by a cutter-class armed Chinese Coast Guard (CCG) ship. After broadcasting warnings for the Bertholf and the Motobu to leave the area, the Chinese ship attempted to maneuver in front of the American ship, to turn its bow. The CCG captain miscalculated and struck the Bertholf amidships, caving in the mess and one of its enlisted crew compartments. The Bertholf began taking on water and attempted to turn east toward the Philippines while emergency crews attempted to keep the ship afloat. The CCG ship immediately left the scene without rendering assistance. Six US sailors later were declared missing and presumed dead in the collision, while three Chinese CCG sailors were swept overboard and lost at sea.
Being the closest U.S. naval vessel to the downed EP-3 surveillance pland, the Curtis Wilbur raced toward the site of its crash, while the Charleston moved to assist the Bertholf. Nighttime darkness caused confusion for rescue and patrol operations on both sides. Two PLAN ships returned to the scene of the maritime collision to search for the lost Chinese seamen, coming in close quarters with the Motobu — which was helping in rescue operations to stabilize the American vessel — as well as with the littoral combat ship Charleston, which arrived several hours later. Mechanical trouble kept the Bertholf from making way under her own power, and she began to drift back toward PLAN vessels. In the darkness, U.S. ships and the Japanese attempted to disengage with the Chinese vessels, while continually warning the other side to stand down so rescue operations could continue.
After several close encounters, one Type 052D Luyang III class PLAN destroyer, the Taiyuan, activated its fire-control radar and locked on the Motobu. The captain of the thousand-ton Japanese patrol ship, knowing he could not survive a direct hit from the PLAN destroyer, radioed repeated demands that the radar be turned off. When no Chinese response was forthcoming, and with rescue operations ongoing, the Motobu’s commander fired one round from his Bushmaster II 30 mm chain gun across the bow of the Taiyuan. In response, a nearby Chinese frigate, thinking it was under attack from the Japanese Coast Guard ship, fired a torpedo in the direction of the Motobu. In the congested seas, however, the torpedo hit the Charleston, which was transiting between the Chinese and Japanese ships, ripping a hole below the waterline. The lightly armored littoral combat ship, with a complement of 50 officers and seamen, foundered in just 25 minutes, with an unknown loss of life, at 01:30 (17:30 Greenwich time; 07:30 Hawaii time; 10:30 Eastern time) on Tuesday, September 9. U.S. surveillance drones flying over the melee recorded parts of the encounter and flashed images back to U.S. commanders in the region.
With radio and electronic traffic flashing between Honolulu and Washington, America’s military leaders in the Pacific began to mobilize the U.S. fleet in Hawaii and Japan to steam into the South China Sea, and launched F-35 fighters from Okinawa to begin forcing Chinese air-force planes out of the skies. After more than a decade of rising tension and distrust between China and the United States, a series of accidents threw the two antagonists against each other. The Littoral War had begun.

Thursday, June 4, 2020

Former Chinese soccer player Hao allies with party critic

2020年六月四号...
BEIJING (AP) — Retired Chinese soccer player Hao Haidong has angered the country’s leadership by allying himself with an eccentric billionaire who has called for the downfall of the Communist government.
Hao appeared Thursday in a lengthy online video swearing allegiance to the “Federal State of New China,” a purported alternative to the ruling Communist Party of China established by Guo Wengui, who lives in exile.
In the video, Hao reads out an 18-point manifesto demanding an end to the current power structure, calling the ruling party a “terrorist organization" that “tramples on democracy,” violates the rule of law and makes contracts it doesn't intend to keep.
He touched on some of the most sensitive topics in China, urging genuine autonomy for Hong Kong, Tibet and the self-governing island of Taiwan. He also accused Beijing of launching “biological warfare” on the world with the coronavirus pandemic, for which there is no evidence.
It wasn't clear when or where the video was made, but its release comes on the 31st anniversary of the military assault on pro-democracy protesters in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square, along with moves to tighten Beijing’s rule over Hong Kong.
Hao’s account on Weibo, China’s hugely popular all-in-one online communications tool, was swiftly deleted. Sports newspaper Titan issued a posting condemning Hao's “damaging of national sovereignty" and vowing never to report on him again. It referred to Hao only by the first letter of his surname, H.
The 50-year-old Hao was a striker for China's national team and also played for Bayi and Dalian Shide. He also briefly joined English club Sheffield United. He has been out of the sport for more than a decade, drawing occasional attention for his controversial remarks.
Along with current China coach Li Tie, he was a star on the squad that made China’s only World Cup appearance in 2002, in which the national team left after three games without scoring a goal.
Hao still holds the national scoring record with 41 goals in more than 100 appearances for China and is also the all-time lead scorer in the Chinese league with 96 goals.
Over the last several weeks, he has questioned one team’s decision to fire a player for having illegally altered his car’s license plate and disputed the official soccer association’s decision not to televise the Chinese team’s World Cup warmup games against local club teams.
“If the national team feels pressure to play the club teams, how can they cope with it when facing other national teams?” Hao was quoted as saying by the official Xinhua News Agency on May 19.
In the past, he has also criticized the decision to allow foreign players to take Chinese citizenship in order to play on the national team and called for the formation of a players union.
Guo Wengui, also known as Miles Guo, fled China amid allegations of financial misdoings and has waged a campaign from New York against president and party leader Xi Jinping and his administration.
Among other stunts, he hired planes to fly over the Hudson River early Thursday morning dragging banners promoting his group and appeared in a video shot on a boat in front of the Statue of Liberty with former Donald Trump campaign manager Steve Bannon.

Tuesday, June 2, 2020

Leaked documents reveal China withheld crucial information about the coronavirus at the start of the outbreak

Xinhua via REUTERS
  • China delayed the release of information about the coronavirus, according to a new investigation.
  • Its health officials did not share the coronavirus genome until over a week after scientists in Chinese laboratories decoded it at the beginning of January.
  • Beijing did not warn the World Health Organization that the virus passed between people until two weeks later.
  • At the time the WHO publicly praised China for its speedy response.
China withheld key information about the coronavirus for weeks after it first emerged in January, delaying the international response to the outbreak, a new investigation has revealed.
Chinese officials failed to share the genetic map, or genome, of the virus for over a week after first decoding it and failed to reveal that the virus could be transmitted between humans for a further two weeks, according to internal World Health Organization documents and testimony obtained by the Associated Press.
The AP reported on Tuesday that while scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology decoded the virus on January 2, Chinese health officials did not publish the details of their findings until over a week later, on January 12.
It wasn't until January 20 that the Chinese state alerted the World Health Organisation and other governments that the virus could pass between people, according to the Associated Press investigation.
This was only after a laboratory in Shanghai led by scientist Zhang Yongzhen published the information a day earlier.
At the time the World Health Organization publicly praised China for what it described as its speedy response to the virus. 
However, WHO officials were privately concerned that China was sitting on key information about the virus.
"We're currently at the stage where yes, they're giving it to us 15 minutes before it appears on [Chinese state television channel] CCTV," WHO official, Dr. Gauden Galea, said in one meeting.
The WHO were reportedly frustrated with China's failure to release the data quickly, and feared being blamed for a delayed global response to the outbreak of the deadly virus, the AP report says.
Dr Michael Ryan, the WHO's emergencies chief, is quoted as saying: "The danger now is that despite our good intent... there will be a lot of finger-pointing at WHO if something does happen."
President Trump has lambasted the WHO and accused it of being controlled by China. He said last week that the US was "terminating its relationship" with the WHO, and re-directing the millions of dollars it gives to the global health body elsewhere.
The AP report says that the National Health Commission, Beijing's most senior health authority, blocked laboratories from releasing information about the COVID-19 virus without its approval, meaning there was a delay in information being published lasting most of January.

UK under pressure to cut ties with Beijing

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo (left) and UK Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab.
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo (left) and UK Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab.
Getty
UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson is set to chair a National Security Council meeting on Tuesday, with the UK's relationship with China reportedly top of the agenda.
Johnson is under pressure from increasing numbers of Members of Parliament in his Conservative party to loosen ties with China for its handling of the coronavirus, as well as its recent move to impose new laws on Hong Kong.
UK Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab is set to make a statement on Hong Kong in the House of Commons on Tuesday afternoon after holding a videoconferencewith US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and counterparts from Canada, Australia, and New Zealand on Monday evening.
Prime Minister Johnson is also expected to shrink Huawei's role in developing Britain's 5G network after striking a controversial agreement with the Chinese telecomms firm earlier this year.
Read the original article on Business Insider

特朗普将如何输掉与中国的贸易战

 编者:本文是 保罗·克鲁格曼于2024年11月15日发表于《纽约时报》的一篇评论文章。特朗普的重新当选有全球化退潮的背景,也有美国民主党没能及时推出有力候选人的因素。相较于民主党的执政,特朗普更加具有个人化的特点,也给时局曾经了更多的不确定性。 好消息:我认为特朗普不会引发全球...