Monday, November 22, 2021

To Paramilitary Groups, Rittenhouse Verdict Means Vindication

 On Friday, as Kyle Rittenhouse stood in a courtroom in Kenosha, Wisconsin, awaiting the verdict in his trial, a large bald man with mutton-chop sideburns sat in a pew several rows behind him. As a court clerk announced Rittenhouse’s acquittal on all charges, a faint smile passed across the man’s lips.

“I’m walking on sunshine,” the man, Kevin Mathewson, said the next day. A local private investigator and former city alderman, he had attended every day of the trial, in which he had more than a passing interest.

Mathewson had become a prominent and divisive figure in Kenosha. Days after George Floyd was killed by a police officer in Minneapolis, Mathewson had created an organization called the Kenosha Guard, an armed group that declared its intent in a Facebook post “to deter rioting/looting” amid racial justice demonstrations in Kenosha. In August 2020, after the police shooting of a Black man named Jacob Blake brought a wave of protests and rioting to the city, Mathewson had written on the Kenosha Guard’s Facebook page urging Kenoshans to take to the streets with guns to defend the city. His Aug. 25 post went viral, drawing thousands of RSVPs and comments threatening violence.

Mathewson’s call to arms was one of several in Kenosha that day, which collectively brought dozens of mostly white armed paramilitaries into the streets of the city’s small downtown, creating a heavily armed confrontation with demonstrators that came to a head with the Rittenhouse shootings. Mathewson went home hours before the shootings, and no evidence ever connected Rittenhouse — whom Mathewson said he had never met — to his Facebook post. But his proximity to the incident led to him being banned from Facebook, where his Aug. 25 post had been flagged repeatedly for violating the platform’s ban on militia activity and had left an aura of suspicion around him.

Now that Rittenhouse had been acquitted, Mathewson felt cleared by association. “It vindicates Kyle,” Mathewson said. “I felt vindicated by it.” And, he said, “It vindicates people that say, ‘Look, no one’s coming to help, we have to help ourselves.’”

The Rittenhouse shootings, and the clash between paramilitaries and demonstrators in which they occurred, represented the lethal culmination of this idea: that the United States had reached a point of crisis in which citizens were required to take up arms to defend it from their fellow citizens. It was an idea with deep roots in American history, and also one deeply entangled with the country’s legacy of racial conflict.

White vigilante groups, some of them openly white supremacist, responded violently to unrest in Black communities in multiple cities in the late 1960s, often with the acquiescence or active support of local police. Photographs of armed Korean American business owners in Los Angeles defending their properties during the 1992 riots have been touchstones for Second Amendment advocates for years, and they were circulated again as social media memes after the Rittenhouse verdict.

In 2020, this strain of armed vigilantism was reactivated by the struggles of mostly Democratic state and local governments and law enforcement in responding to rioting and prolonged unrest in several major cities after Floyd’s death. And it was fanned by conservative media figures and Republican politicians, who encouraged their audiences and supporters to see the failure to preserve order as part and parcel of the Democratic agenda.

“I’m really concerned about the gun fetish, and those who really buy into the ‘good guy with a gun’ scenario,” Anthony Kennedy, an alderman in Kenosha, said after the verdict. “Those people who see the breakdown of society, think they need to be armed — this just validates their worldview. And that’s bad for all of us.”

Rittenhouse’s trial was an important test of how the legal system would address one of the signature developments that emerged amid the violent fracturing of American politics in 2020: the presence of armed counterprotesters at racial justice demonstrations, both peaceful and otherwise. In some cases, the armed groups and individuals were openly opposed to, and antagonistic toward, demonstrators. In others, they presented themselves as a volunteer security presence for private or government buildings, or even as neutral peacekeepers, although they were rarely welcomed as such by demonstrators.

Their actions were not without precedent. Members of the Oath Keepers militia were present in Ferguson, Missouri, after the police shooting of Michael Brown there in 2014. Elizabeth Neumann, a former assistant secretary for counterterrorism and threat prevention at the Department of Homeland Security, where she tracked domestic extremism, argued that such groups represented a particularly elusive kind of security threat, in part because the armed groups themselves did not necessarily see themselves that way.

“An Oath Keeper, they see themselves as being there for protecting,” she said. Their mindset, she added, is that “they’re there in case there’s a bad day — and if the government keeps violating our rights, there might come a day when they need to launch a revolution.”

The armed groups that materialized in Kenosha appeared to span a range of motivations. Some were highly ideological, including members of the anarchic far-right Boogaloo movement, who could be seen in footage from several nights placing themselves between demonstrators and police and guarding private property. Others saw themselves as simply defending local businesses or providing a sort of heavily armed neighborhood watch in the absence of an overstretched police department.

Doug Flucke, who stood watch as part of a group outside a restaurant in another part of Kenosha the night of the Rittenhouse shootings, said in a Facebook message last month that his group was “ready to help and stand next to our Blue to show them that they had support from their community and they weren’t alone.”

Prominent media and political personalities on the right in Wisconsin and elsewhere had discussed throughout the summer the need for this kind of community-level response to what they depicted as Democratic failure in the face of rioting. Appearing on a talk-radio program the day after the Rittenhouse shootings, David Clarke, the former Milwaukee County sheriff and a right-wing political celebrity, said that he did not advocate “some of the stuff that’s starting to happen” but that he would not condemn it either, and he advised listeners to have a plausible argument for their actions in such cases.

“Think about it, have a plan,” he said. “You have to act reasonably. Then you’re going to have to articulate what you did afterwards.” After the Rittenhouse verdict Friday, Clarke told Newsmax that he had to “hold back tears” after the verdict was read. “I’ve talked to this young man,” he said. “He’s been under a lot.”

A 2013 Urban Institute study found marked disparities in how often homicides were deemed justifiable by juries based on the race of the parties involved. And “stand your ground” laws, which codify a particularly expansive right to self-defense, have played a role in the acquittal of defendants accused of killing Black people who were unarmed in several high-profile cases, most notably in George Zimmerman’s shooting of Trayvon Martin, a Black teenager, in 2012. Three white men currently on trial in Georgia for the murder of Ahmaud Arbery — a 25-year-old Black man who was unarmed and whom the men pursued through their neighborhood — have similarly claimed self-defense.

Rittenhouse’s detractors rushed to cast his acquittal as part of this pattern. “This system isn’t built to hold white supremacists accountable,” U.S. Rep. Cori Bush, D-Mo., a Black Lives Matter activist elected to Congress last year, wrote on Twitter shortly after the decision.

But the Rittenhouse shootings — which happened after he brought an assault-style rifle to the aftermath of a racial justice protest — diverged in significant ways from that template. The three men Rittenhouse shot, two of them fatally, were all white, and the shootings occurred in a genuinely chaotic and violent situation, with deadly weapons present on all sides.

His acquittal was considered a likely outcome by legal analysts, who had regarded the prosecution’s path to conviction on homicide charges as exceptionally steep because it would have required demonstrating beyond reasonable doubt that Rittenhouse had not acted in self-defense. “I think this is not a terribly surprising verdict,” said Michael O’Hear, a professor at Marquette University Law School in Milwaukee.

“I don’t think the kid was a Klan member,” Raymond Roberts, a local data analyst and activist, said of Rittenhouse. “It was just the privilege of it: ‘Because I’m white, I can walk around in tac gear with a rifle, and the police will say thank you.’”

In June 2020, Roberts, who is Black and an Army veteran, had organized an armed demonstration to counter Mathewson’s Kenosha Guard, calling on fellow veterans to openly carry firearms in solidarity with racial justice demonstrators. But at the event, Roberts had chosen to carry a permitted concealed handgun rather than a rifle — a common choice among local racial justice activists who armed themselves at demonstrations in Kenosha that summer.

To Roberts, the Rittenhouse verdict was a stark reminder of who was likely to be seen by the police and jury members as “helping” in a situation such as the one Rittenhouse placed himself in, and who was not.

“I have to be honest and say I’m angry because I’m jealous,” Roberts said. “That 17-year-old white boy, this country belongs to him more than it’ll ever belong to me. It doesn’t matter how many years I did in the Army, how much taxes I pay. I can’t do what he did. I can’t walk around in the middle of the night open carrying.

Kennedy, the alderman, who is also Black and an Army veteran, agreed. If he had been in Rittenhouse’s situation, “My ass would’ve been dead on the street,” he said. “I wouldn’t have been arrested.”

© 2021 The New York Times Company

Saturday, November 6, 2021

德国人收藏的中国宣传画 如今看来很有意思

 


老照片,一个时代的烙印,一个久远的故事,一份珍贵的记忆。德国有本名为GEO的地理人文性杂志,最近一期是介绍近现代中国的。我在达姆火车站等车的时候无意中见到,就翻开来看看,感觉里面不少照片和宣传画很有意思。

我在德国早就听说过一个来自阿姆斯特丹的汉学系教授,名叫 Stefan R. Landsberger,他在上世纪70年代就喜欢收集中国的宣传画,截止到现在,怎么着也有几百上千幅了。此人曾经出过相关的书籍。今天我就把他收集的,建国后到76年,中国大部分时间处于极左年代时的宣传画,部分地展示给大家。我估计很多画,老一代的人应该有印象,年轻人就好好学习学习吧。

当然了,很多人是出于艺术价值的考虑去收藏这些画,事实上很多特殊时期的宣传画现在确实已经非常值钱了,但这不在今天的讨论范围之内。



设计者:哈琼文  翁逸之   1960年1月



设计者:徐灵  1950年



设计者:赵延年  钱大昕 1953年10月



设计者:佚名 1955年



设计者:翁逸之   1956年5月



设计者:田郁文  朱章  1958年10月



设计者:佚名  1960年



设计者:钱大昕   1965年4月



设计者:毕成 1956年9月



设计者:李平凡  平野  1958年7月



设计者:杨文绣 1959年12月















1966年,作者不详



设计者:佚名 1968年11月



设计者::佚名1967年



设计者:呼和浩特革命造反联络总部美术组  1966年



设计者:佚名  1967年1月 北京政法学院政法公社毛zedong主义红wei兵宣传队



设计者:佚名  1968年4月



设计者:王晖  1967年



设计者:上海红旗机械厂革委会  1969年12月



设计者:浙江工农兵美术大学, 王肇达供稿  1969年5月





设计者:驻沪海军航空某部东海红  1971年1月



设计者:吉林省电影发行公司革委会供稿  1971年6月







设计者:佚名  1967年1月





设计者:佚名  1966年



设计者:华北民兵编辑部  1972年纪念毛zhuxi大办民兵师指示二十周年宣传画之二



设计者:佚名  1966-1967年



设计者:四川人民出版社   1977年5月



设计者:哈琼文  1965年7月克莱因瓶是一个不可定向的二



设计者:佚名  1967年





设计者:王永强  1977年1月



设计者:佚名  1976年

克莱因瓶是一个不可定向的



设计者:天津人民美术出版社,1976年11月

人们常说东方文明是精神的文明,西方文明是物质的文明或唯物的文明。这是有夸大狂的妄人捏造出来的谣言,用来遮掩我们的羞脸的。其实,一切文明都有物质和精神的两部分:材料都是物质的,而运用材料的心思才智都是精神的。比如,木头是物质,而刳木为舟,构木为屋,都靠人的智力,那便是精神的部分。

器物越完备复杂,精神的因子越多。一只蒸汽锅炉,一辆摩托车,一部有声电影机器,其中所含的精神因子比我们老祖宗的瓦罐、大车、毛笔多的多了。

Saturday, October 30, 2021

神总结:“厉害国”到底是一个什么样的国?

 这是网上流传的一篇文章,可惜不知是谁所总结,但是总结很到位。所谓的厉害国,实际上是这个地球上最垃圾的国家,自豪吧,厉害国!

中国不一定是与邻国土地争端最多的国家,但肯定是与本国公民土地争端最多的国家。争端不是问题,问题是:对外用和平解决土地争端,对内却用暴力解决土地争端。对外土地争端你们从来没有赢过一次,对内土地争端你们从来没输过一次!

世上有个国家,看征税像欧洲国家;看福利像非洲国家;看政府大楼像超级大国;看边远地区像山顶洞人部落;看官员生活像海湾国家;看百姓生活像食人族国家;看官员发言像君子国;看官员做事像谎话国;对政府有利的就与国际接轨;对政府不利的就装神弄鬼;对外是最负责任的国家;对内是最不负责任的国家。

这个世界的荒唐之处是:自由世界的人们对自己拥有的自由从不满足,而不自由国家的子民却对压根沾不到边的自由表现出一副心满意足的样子。

一个连文字都被敏感屏蔽的国家,不要相信它的任何报道;一个连言论都能将你治罪的国家,不要相信它的任何宣传;一个连良心都能把你判刑的国家,不要相信它的任何口号;一个连巨贪都能获得轻判的国家,不要相信它的任何承诺;一个连枪口都能对准百姓的国家,不要相信它的任何举措。

有人问:不撒谎会死吗?!其实我们很多普通人真的不知道,在中国不撒谎真的会死。知识分子不撒谎,不是气死就是憋死;当官的不撒谎,不是屈死就是冤死;商人不撒谎,不是破财死就是跳楼死;老百姓不撒谎,不是穷死就是累死。近代中国,每一个所谓成功故事的背后,都藏着无尽谎言。

一条海峡把中国人民隔成两个政治实体。一边的公民牛逼了,追着官员骂,把官员骂得低头撅腚。另一边的贪官牛逼了,追着人民打,打得人民哭爹喊娘。

大陆政府跟台湾政府的最大不同是:台湾政府无论怎么服务民众,民众都能找出他们服务不到位的地方加以批评。大陆政府则是无论怎么伤害民众,都能找出这是出自于为人民服务的好意服务很完美的理由。

美国是移进最多、移出最少的国家,证明是最好的国家。某国是移出最多、移进最少的国家,证明是最差的国家。朝鲜是既不让移进、也不让移出的国家,证明是最邪恶的国家。无论你自称制度多么先进、自称道路多么自信、自称理论多么牛逼,老百姓用脚投票来证明:这都是个屁!

从新闻里看到谎言;从历史里看到无耻;从外交里看到无能;从维稳里看到残暴;从强拆里看到贪婪;从贪官里看到腐朽;从司法里看到黑暗;从禁言里看到心虚;从打压里看到崩溃;从反抗里看到胜利!

【关于社会】

一朋友两口子要移民美国,其父亲是老革命老党员,苦劝未果后暴跳如雷:你们要移民美国,就断绝父子关系。夫妻执意前往,工作顺利后生一子,邀请父亲来看望小孙子。老头子思孙心切,多次拒绝后终于同意前往。半年后依然不打算回国,给国内自己老友打电话:“他奶奶的,俺被骗了一辈子啊!”

中国人是最幽默的!有人去保卫钓鱼岛,结果落水后被日本人救了,回国后却被自己人抓了。有人说香港澳门回归了,想去自己土地扬眉吐气一次,结果通行证没办下来。有人讲海峡两岸同属一个中国,打电话想问候那边的亲人,结果按国际漫游收费。

当匹夫有难时,国家不见了;当国家有难时,匹夫有责。神逻辑。你们的女人你们抱,你们的国家你们保。我们只是看客。

昧著良心赞美,这叫五毛。用指责与批评督促执政者改良,这叫公民。明明身处最底层,却站出来维护统治者,这叫脑残。听到讲真话的人,扑上去就咬,这叫走狗。两耳不闻窗外事,吃饱喝足是最高境界,这叫猪。

打你,叫执法;一起打你,叫联合执法。你跑,叫畏罪潜逃;你不跑,叫妨碍公务。你防卫,叫抗法;你反抗,叫暴力抗法。你正当防卫,叫故意伤人;他故意伤人,叫正常执法。你死,叫突发急病。你喊冤,叫社会不稳定因素。你上访,叫精神病。你上网,叫散布谣言。生命无须精彩,活着就是奇迹,且活、且珍惜。

【关于他们】

《国际歌》唱道:从来就没有什么救世主,也不靠神仙皇帝。他们却高叫:只有他们才能救中国!毛主席是大救星!

他们建党以来做了四件事:以革命的名义杀人,以公有的名义抢劫,以改革的名义分赃,以维稳的名义封口。

(两个凡是新解)凡是能够从人民手里收钱的,哪个角落他们都不会遗忘,不论道路、学校、医院、风景、名胜、寺庙、地摊……凡是需要承担责任的,都没有他们的影子,不论教育、养老、住房、医疗、公益……

杂技演员走钢丝时,手里都拿根长杆儿,身子歪时,就用长杆儿找平衡。如果你非要求他身子完全保持垂直,那他一定会掉下来。一个国家、一个社会,如果你总看见执政者拿着杆子左一下右一下,维稳姿势特难看,那基本可以断定,他们走的绝不是康庄大道。杆子晃动得越频繁,就越说明他们快坚持不下去了。

你怀疑食品有毒,他们骂你多事;而当地沟油出现时,他们却沉默了。你说贪腐严重,他们骂你汉奸;而当大批房叔表叔出现时,他们却沉默了。你说有豆腐渣工程,他们说你胡说;而当桥塌楼倒时,他们却沉默了。你说过度发展会引起环境污染,他们骂你卖国;而当雾霾天气出现。他们却沉默了。他们的良心被狗吃了吗?

【关于历史】

六十五年前,有个声音向全世界宣告:中国人民从此站起来了!六十五年后,又有个人向全世界宣告:中国这头狮子已经醒了!明白了,原来这六十五年,中国人是站着睡了一觉,难怪做了那么多噩梦。

“你想发财吗?你想不交租吗?你想分财主的东西吗?你想睡东家的小老婆么?跟着红军走吧!”——工农红军宣 1928年8月。

经官媒巧妙引导,钓鱼岛成为“爱国”热点,而比钓鱼岛重要百倍的海参崴却了无声息。敢去要海参崴吗?1945年签订“中苏友好同盟条约”,国民政府提出收回大连、海参崴、库叶群岛等地的主权。苏联同意归还大连、旅顺和满洲铁路,并达成协议50年后中国收回海参崴。按约1996年中国应收回海参崴,但2001年签订中俄条约,竟确认海参崴等地为俄罗斯领土!最搞笑的是:自带干粮跑到海参崴去喊打钓鱼岛,这不是幽默吗?

延安时代的两性生活:露水夫妻每晚交5毛行房费。 1938年前后,延安队伍男女比例30:1,巨大悬殊让青年女性成为最引人注目的一道风景。许多新婚男女因条件限制,只有周末才能到窑洞的“青年宿舍”团聚性交,一晚5毛钱。看来五毛历史悠久啊!现在发一帖顶原来搞一晚,通货膨胀啊。

白龙尾岛面积数十倍于钓鱼岛,扼守北部湾中部,岛上居民全部是说中文的中国人。台湾军队一直占据到1957年,被解放军拿下。不久被送给了越南。

【关于国人】

一个跪了太久的民族,站起来会恐高,并且能为下跪找出一万个理由。正如梁启超说:财产被劫掠时,他说还有自由;自由被剥夺时,他说还有生命;生命被扼杀时,他还谢主隆恩。即使眼前一无是处,他也能找到赞美的一万个理由。

内战当过炮灰,朝战帮过金胖子,大跃进炼过钢铁,放过卫星,然后饿过三年肚子,文革搞过打砸抢,批斗老师和亲人,捧著红宝书被上山下乡,熬到回城被晚婚,想生孩子被计划,没两年成了下岗职工,外出告状被维稳,退休了还被污水和雾霾包围。难得的是,他们依然唱红歌怀念毛主席。

日本著名管理大师大前研一说:在中国旅行时发现,城市遍街都是按摩店,而书店却寥寥无几,中国人均每天读书不足15分钟,人均阅读量只有日本几十分之一,是典型的“低智商社会”。


Thursday, September 23, 2021

收藏备用

 搞学习


CSDN:https://www.csdn.net/

TED(最优质的演讲):

https://www.ted.com/

谷粉学术:

https://gfsoso.99lb.net/scholar.html

大学资源网:http://www.dxzy163.com/

简答题:http://www.jiandati.com/

网易公开课:https://open.163.com/ted/

网易云课堂:https://study.163.com/

中国大学MOOC:www.icourse163.org

哔哩哔哩弹幕网:www.bilibili.com

我要自学网:www.51zxw.net

知乎:www.zhihu.com

学堂在线:www.xuetangx.com

爱课程:www.icourses.cn

猫咪论文:https://lunwen.im/

iData(论文搜索):www.cn-ki.net

文泉考试:https://www.wqkaoshi.com


找书籍

书栈网(极力推荐):https://www.bookstack.cn/

码农之家(计算机电子书下载):

www.xz577.com

鸠摩搜书:www.jiumodiary.com

云海电子图书馆:www.pdfbook.cn

周读(书籍搜索):ireadweek.com

知轩藏书:http://www.zxcs.me/

脚本之家电子书下载:

https://www.jb51.net/books/

搜书VIP-电子书搜索:

http://www.soshuvip.com/all.html

书格(在线古籍图书馆):

https://new.shuge.org/

caj云阅读:

http://cajviewer.cnki.net/cajcloud/

必看网(人生必看的书籍):

https://www.biikan.com/


冷知识 / 黑科技

上班摸鱼必备(假装电脑系统升级):http://fakeupdate.net/

PIECES 拼图(30 个 CSS 碎片进行拼图,呈现 30 种濒临灭绝的动物):

http://www.species-in-pieces.com/

图片立体像素画:

https://pissang.github.io/voxelize-image/

福利单词(一个不太正经的背单词网站):

http://dict.ftqq.com

查无此人(刷新网站,展现一张AI 生成的人脸照片):

https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/

在线制作地图图例:https://mapchart.net/

创意光线绘画:http://weavesilk.com/

星系观察:https://stellarium-web.org/

煎蛋:http://jandan.net/

渣男-说话的艺术:https://lovelive.tools/

全历史:https://www.allhistory.com/

iData:https://www.cn-ki.net/

术语在线:http://www.termonline.cn/


写代码

GitHub:https://github.com/

码云:https://gitee.com/

源码之家:https://www.mycodes.net/

JSON to Dart:

https://javiercbk.github.io/json_to_dart/

Json在线解析验证:

https://www.json.cn/

在线接口测试(Getman):

https://getman.cn/


资源搜索 

DogeDoge搜索引擎:www.dogedoge.com

秘迹搜索:https://mijisou.com/

小白盘:https://www.xiaobaipan.com/

云盘精灵(资源搜索):

www.yunpanjingling.com

虫部落(资源搜索):

www.chongbuluo.com

如风搜(资源搜索):

http://www.rufengso.net/

爱扒:https://www.zyboe.com/


小工具 

奶牛快传(在线传输文件利器):cowtransfer.com

文叔叔(大文件传输,不限速):

https://www.wenshushu.cn/

云端超级应用空间(PS,PPT,Excel,Ai):https://uzer.me/

香当网(年终总结,个人简历,事迹材料,租赁合同,演讲稿):

https://www.xiangdang.net/

二维码生成:https://cli.im/

搜狗翻译:fanyi.sogou.com

熵数(图表制作,数据可视化):

https://dydata.io/appv2/#/pages/index/home

拷贝兔:https://cp.anyknew.com/

图片无限变放大:http://bigjpg.com/zh

幕布(在线大纲笔记工具):mubu.com

在线转换器(在线转换器转换任何测量单位):https://zh.justcnw.com/

调查问卷制作:

https://www.wenjuan.com/

果核剥壳(软件下载):

https://www.ghpym.com/

软件下载:https://www.unyoo.com/

MSDN我告诉你(windows10系统镜像下载):https://msdn.itellyou.cn/


导航页(工具集)

世界各国网址大全:

http://www.world68.com/

小森林导航:http://www.xsldh6.com/

简捷工具:http://www.shulijp.com/

NiceTool.net 好工具网:

http://www.nicetool.net/

现实君工具箱(综合型在线工具集成网站):http://tool.uixsj.cn/

蓝调网站:http://lcoc.top/

偷渡鱼:https://touduyu.com/

牛导航:http://www.ziliao6.com/

小呆导航:

https://www.webjike.com/index.html

简法主页:http://www.jianfast.com/

KIM主页:https://kim.plopco.com/

聚BT:https://jubt.net/cn/index.html

精准云工具合集:

https://jingzhunyun.com/

兔2工具合集:https://www.tool2.cn/

爱资料工具(在线实用工具集合):

www.toolnb.com

工具导航:https://hao.logosc.cn/


看视频

阿木影视:https://www.aosk.online/

电影推荐(分类别致):

http://www.mvcat.com

APP影院:https://app.movie

去看TV:https://www.qukantv.net/

动漫视频网:http://www.zzzfun.com/

94神马电影网:http://www.9rmb.com/

NO视频官网:http://www.novipnoad.com/

蓝光画质电影:http://www.languang.co/

在线看剧:http://dy.27234.cn/

大数据导航:http://hao.199it.com/

多功能图片网站:

https://www.logosc.cn/so/

牛牛TV:http://www.ziliao6.com/tv/

VideoFk解析视频:

http://www.videofk.com/

蓝调网站:http://lcoc.top/vip2.3/

永久资源采集网:

http://www.yongjiuzy1.com/


学设计

码力全开(产品/设计师/独立开发者的资源库):https://www.maliquankai.com/designnav/

免费音频素材:https://icons8.cn/music

新CG儿(视频素材模板,无水印+免费下载):

https://www.newcger.com/

Iconfont(阿里巴巴矢量图标库):

https://www.iconfont.cn/

小图标下载:https://www.easyicon.net/

Flight Icon:https://www.flighticon.co/

第一字体转换器:http://www.diyiziti.com/

doyoudosh(平面设计):

www.doyoudo.com

企业宣传视频在线制作:https://duomu.tv/

MAKE海报设计官网:http://maka.im/

一键海报神器:

https://www.logosc.cn/photo/utm_source=hao.logosc.cn&utm_medium=referral

字由(字体设计):

http://www.hellofont.cn/

查字体网站:https://fonts.safe.360.cn/

爱给网(免费素材下载的网站,包括音效、配乐,3D、视频、游戏,平面、教程):http://www.aigei.com/

在线视频剪辑:

https://bilibili.clipchamp.com/editor


搞文档

即书(在线制作PPT):

https://www.keysuper.com/

PDF处理:https://smallpdf.com/cn

PDF处理:https://www.ilovepdf.com/zh-cn

PDF处理:https://www.pdfpai.com/

PDF处理:https://www.hipdf.cn/

图片压缩,PDF处理:

https://docsmall.com/

腾讯文档(在线协作编辑和管理文档):

docs.qq.com

ProcessOn(在线协作制作结构图):

www.processon.com

iLovePDF(在线转换PDF利器):

www.ilovepdf.com

PPT在线制作:https://www.woodo.cn/

PDF24工具(pdf处理工具):

https://tools.pdf24.org/en

IMGBOT(在线图片处理):

www.imgbot.ai

福昕云编辑(在线编辑PDF):

edit.foxitcloud.cn

TinyPNG(在线压缩图片):tinypng.com

UZER.ME(在线使用各种大应用,在线使用CAD,MATLAB,Office三件套

    ):uzer.me

优品PPT(模板下载):

http://www.ypppt.com/

第一PPT(模板下载):

http://www.1ppt.com/xiazai/

三顿PPT导航:sandunppt.com

找图片

电脑壁纸:http://lcoc.top/bizhi/

https://unsplash.com/

https://pixabay.com/

https://www.pexels.com/

https://visualhunt.com/

https://www.ssyer.com/

彼岸图网:http://pic.netbian.com/

极像素(超高清大图):

https://www.sigoo.com/

免费版权图片搜索:

https://www.logosc.cn/so/

特朗普将如何输掉与中国的贸易战

 编者:本文是 保罗·克鲁格曼于2024年11月15日发表于《纽约时报》的一篇评论文章。特朗普的重新当选有全球化退潮的背景,也有美国民主党没能及时推出有力候选人的因素。相较于民主党的执政,特朗普更加具有个人化的特点,也给时局曾经了更多的不确定性。 好消息:我认为特朗普不会引发全球...